Rationalists : Which is difficult for you to accept : God or ESP/Paranormal Phenomena?
If someone says God exists and if someone says, that he/she has experienced paranormal phenomena, what would be more difficult for you to believe
If someone says God exists and if someone says, that he/she has experienced paranormal phenomena, what would be more difficult for you to believe
Comments
God,
cause I have the Powers:
Powers attained thru Concentration
http://www.buddhanet.net/wings_d.htm
The Fundamentals of Meditation Practice
http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/chanmed1.pdf
I'm still waiting for god to expose himself.
i wouldn't say either are more difficult to believe, but paranormal phenomena is a lot more believable considering you can actually look at possible evidence. but again there is some evidence that there could be a god
after thinking about it i conclude that both are mildly difficult to except considering the evidence we are presented with.
God. if something is paranormal its simply something out of the ordinary, or outside of ones notions or knowledge of things. According to the dictionary it is "seemingly outside normal sensory" the key word there is seemingly. Chances are there's an explanation for paranormal things.
It's more difficult to believe in a god.
What we call paranormal activity can be natural in origin, just outside the regular human's perception except in specific situations.
Pascal's wager in basic terms works in case you anticipate Christianity is real. in any different case, there is not any God discern to wager against. From a nontheistic viewpoint, it relatively is basically too imprecise a reasoning to evaluate. ok, I contend that it may be extra proper to have confidence in God than to no longer, yet which God do i decide for? back, Pascal's wager assumes the Christian God is actual. faith is an important subject for those arguments to artwork; arguments that attempt to teach God's existance or necessity interior the 1st place! Behold, the atheist's counter-wager: stay your existence properly, and do all you may to assist mankind. If God would not exist, a minimum of you used your one existence properly. If God does exist, he will reward your love and kindness. If God would not reward you in view which you probably did no longer have confidence in him, that's no longer certainly one of those God you may decide to spend eternity with anyhow.
None is difficult to accept.
I consider them equally unbelievable. There is no solid evidence for either.
I would have to say god
Both are believable to those who believe in them.
God. It is completely irrational.