European genetics shows populations moved into Europe through southwest Asia. Collectively, human genetic sequences everywhere in the world show a slow march out of Africa. There are several archaic populations in Siberia and central asia that show affinity with Native populations, but modern Asian populations are not really that closely related. Just like how some populations in Europe show affinity to populations in central Asian or Asia Minor. The longer a population is in a particular place the more distinct mutations occur.
But, here is an interesting tidbit. You can find straight ASIAN genetic sequences in modern Finns, even though they are also the population with the highest prevalence of blond/blue eyed genes. They also speak a non-Euoprean language called Uralic, that includes Samoyed (an Asian population) in the same language family. There is overlap everywhere.
Not really. Siberia was simply a stop along the way. Since we all come from Africa, to get here on foot you have to walk up to Spain (when there was a land bridge,) or go through Egypt, and head east to Russia, go across Siberia, until you see the land bridge (or ice bridge) across the Bering Strait, and take that over to Alaska and North America.
it is a delusion the Europeans have created so as to justify the genocide that resulted after their looking us. If we got here from someplace else, then this wasn't quite *our* land then, became into it? And if it wasn't our land (technically), then it became into ok for the Europeans to take it from us suitable? would desire to is right, suited suited? it is all a crock. there is actual greater data best to the tip that Natives got here from here and went over the land-bridge THERE than data that it became into vice versa. even nevertheless that would shrink to rubble their total "all existence began in Africa" concept besides.
I didn't look at your link because I generally don't like doing that but yes they did. The first Indians to arrive to America were called the Paleo meaning first Indians.
Comments
And?
European genetics shows populations moved into Europe through southwest Asia. Collectively, human genetic sequences everywhere in the world show a slow march out of Africa. There are several archaic populations in Siberia and central asia that show affinity with Native populations, but modern Asian populations are not really that closely related. Just like how some populations in Europe show affinity to populations in central Asian or Asia Minor. The longer a population is in a particular place the more distinct mutations occur.
But, here is an interesting tidbit. You can find straight ASIAN genetic sequences in modern Finns, even though they are also the population with the highest prevalence of blond/blue eyed genes. They also speak a non-Euoprean language called Uralic, that includes Samoyed (an Asian population) in the same language family. There is overlap everywhere.
Not really. Siberia was simply a stop along the way. Since we all come from Africa, to get here on foot you have to walk up to Spain (when there was a land bridge,) or go through Egypt, and head east to Russia, go across Siberia, until you see the land bridge (or ice bridge) across the Bering Strait, and take that over to Alaska and North America.
it is a delusion the Europeans have created so as to justify the genocide that resulted after their looking us. If we got here from someplace else, then this wasn't quite *our* land then, became into it? And if it wasn't our land (technically), then it became into ok for the Europeans to take it from us suitable? would desire to is right, suited suited? it is all a crock. there is actual greater data best to the tip that Natives got here from here and went over the land-bridge THERE than data that it became into vice versa. even nevertheless that would shrink to rubble their total "all existence began in Africa" concept besides.
that is one possible and likely scenario
because 20-15 ,000 years ago the climate was and ice age which LOWERED the ocean and exposed land paths
it is also possible some came from Europe across the north atlantic. people did have boats
More remotely there might have been immigrants form Asia across the pacific or even from the Mediterranean
there seem no possible way the earliest humans could have reached the americas in "out of Africa migrations"
there is still very little know about the earliest Americans
so many died out after 1500 -1600 from disease
DNA is so mixed today tracing is very very difficult
most but not all. some shared a stone age "technology" that was native to inhabitants of what is now Europe.
I didn't look at your link because I generally don't like doing that but yes they did. The first Indians to arrive to America were called the Paleo meaning first Indians.
The only question is whether they were walking over ice or dry land at the time.
East Asia and they were/are racially Mongoloid