do u consider a pokemon fetish as beastiality?
i was arguing with my friends about that. i was saying no its not, as pokemon are BASED off of animals, they are fictional and are not considered beastiality. they say that pokemon are like, 90% animal, so that makes it count as beasiality. so what do u think?
and btw, no mean comments. i dont need them here.
Comments
I think that it isn't (and shouldn't) be considered bestiality because of 4 reasons
1. Like you said, they are BASED off of real animals
2. It's not like you are having sex with them, they are fictional.
3. Even if they are 90% animal, having a lot of Pokémon is like having a lot of pets.
4. Loving Pokémon and having a lot of them is like being a cat lady, if you love cats and own 20 of them, does that mean you have a cat fetish and it should be considered bestiality?
Those are my 4 reasons why "a fetish for Pokémon" shouldn't be considered bestiality.
"Odd" lies in the eyes and ears of the beholder. We in the US are allowed to do what we want unless it's illegal, and if one has a religious doctrine that adds to their rules, one wouldn't do some things. However it's up to the person what he/she believes in. One can always find people who believe their same beliefs. So in my opinion one can have a fetish if it suits them personally. It's not anybody else's job to "fix" someone who thinks differently than we do. We do well to control ourselves, let alone anyone else.