Hard to say, they're both great brands, they both cost about the same (KWA=$10 cheaper), they both have about the same FPS, they're both full metal and use quality materials (such aluminum alloy), they're both M4s, and there both excellent guns. The biggest different i see is that KWA uses a 10” free float picatinny rail adapter system (handguard) and VFC uses regular stock rails with covers
I personally like KWAs but I can't say its better because I haven't shot a VFC M4.
I would go to an airsoft store that have both of those and shoot them at their shooting range. Even though they can be similar, every gun is different in a way. One of those guns will be your taste, good luck!
Welcome to united statesa. is powerful, and that i might basically choose to function 2 themes to his answer. a million) in spite of if the .22LR rifle grew to alter into into considered an "attack weapon" (which that may not), it would choose to no longer be registered by way of actuality the registry closed in 1991 or 2001, reckoning at genuinely one in all those "attack weapon". If the registry grew to alter into into although open, then the ban does no longer be very effective! 2) Welcome to united statesa. forgot to show that a HSC maintains to be required for a .22LR handgun. in any diverse case i think of of he dealt with the question o.ok..
Comments
Hard to say, they're both great brands, they both cost about the same (KWA=$10 cheaper), they both have about the same FPS, they're both full metal and use quality materials (such aluminum alloy), they're both M4s, and there both excellent guns. The biggest different i see is that KWA uses a 10” free float picatinny rail adapter system (handguard) and VFC uses regular stock rails with covers
I personally like KWAs but I can't say its better because I haven't shot a VFC M4.
I would go to an airsoft store that have both of those and shoot them at their shooting range. Even though they can be similar, every gun is different in a way. One of those guns will be your taste, good luck!
Welcome to united statesa. is powerful, and that i might basically choose to function 2 themes to his answer. a million) in spite of if the .22LR rifle grew to alter into into considered an "attack weapon" (which that may not), it would choose to no longer be registered by way of actuality the registry closed in 1991 or 2001, reckoning at genuinely one in all those "attack weapon". If the registry grew to alter into into although open, then the ban does no longer be very effective! 2) Welcome to united statesa. forgot to show that a HSC maintains to be required for a .22LR handgun. in any diverse case i think of of he dealt with the question o.ok..