NO. It's part of your anatomy and helps with your digestion when you eat food.
Pankration was a sporting event introduced into the Greek Olympic Games in 648 BC and founded as a blend of boxing and wrestling but with scarcely any rules. The only things not acceptable were biting and gouging out the opponent's eyes.
MMA has rules so it is not like MMA either. It's just a sport in it's own class and should be respected as such rather than trying to classify it into something it is not. Why is that not OK?
PS: Learn to spell so you don't embarrass yourself. Really, not trying to be mean and I am by no means perfect in my spelling but this would have been embarrassing to me.
Pancrase was called "hybrid wrestling" because it combined Freestyle with Catch/shoot wrestling and other submission styles like Judo and Sambo, plus some basic kickboxing-based striking. The "wrestling" aspect was actually a reference to professional "wrestling"; they wanted to have real ("shoot") matches with pro wrestling "rules" which banned closed-fist punches to the head and allowed one to break a hold by grabbing the ropes.
I think it's generally accepted as a sub-style of MMA, although it predates the modern MMA rules by about seven years. The Shamrock brothers and Bas Rutten, who were some of the original fighters in Pancrase, refer to their style as "Shoot Fighting" or "Submission Fighting", terms that are synonymous with MMA.
Pancrase is a Japanese sport whose origins come from legendary Catch Wrestler Karl Gotch who introduced Catch Wrestling to the Japanese people. Pankration is an ancient Greek sport that allowed punching, kicking, and grappling. It was featured in the early Olympic Games in Greece. Pancrase gets its name from Pankration.
Comments
NO. It's part of your anatomy and helps with your digestion when you eat food.
Pankration was a sporting event introduced into the Greek Olympic Games in 648 BC and founded as a blend of boxing and wrestling but with scarcely any rules. The only things not acceptable were biting and gouging out the opponent's eyes.
MMA has rules so it is not like MMA either. It's just a sport in it's own class and should be respected as such rather than trying to classify it into something it is not. Why is that not OK?
PS: Learn to spell so you don't embarrass yourself. Really, not trying to be mean and I am by no means perfect in my spelling but this would have been embarrassing to me.
Pancrase was called "hybrid wrestling" because it combined Freestyle with Catch/shoot wrestling and other submission styles like Judo and Sambo, plus some basic kickboxing-based striking. The "wrestling" aspect was actually a reference to professional "wrestling"; they wanted to have real ("shoot") matches with pro wrestling "rules" which banned closed-fist punches to the head and allowed one to break a hold by grabbing the ropes.
I think it's generally accepted as a sub-style of MMA, although it predates the modern MMA rules by about seven years. The Shamrock brothers and Bas Rutten, who were some of the original fighters in Pancrase, refer to their style as "Shoot Fighting" or "Submission Fighting", terms that are synonymous with MMA.
Pancrase is a Japanese sport whose origins come from legendary Catch Wrestler Karl Gotch who introduced Catch Wrestling to the Japanese people. Pankration is an ancient Greek sport that allowed punching, kicking, and grappling. It was featured in the early Olympic Games in Greece. Pancrase gets its name from Pankration.
pancreas is an organ...
It's basically real wrestling. Wat rules with rope breaks and all just there really fighting