¿necesito ayuda para pasar a ingles esto:?
Para Platón el Ser tiene realidad eterna y consistente en tanto que la cosmovisión de Aristóteles más definida es la del devenir.
Ambas posiciones se unen en la afirmación de que ambas realidades son efectivamente reales.
Platón como Sócrates le daba validez a los juicios éticos y ambos por medio de la discusión racional intentaban entender estos valores y lograr una definición.
Los valores éticos son ideales que se espera sean realizados en forma concreta en el mundo material.
Para Platón los valores ideales son inmutables y son captados intuitivamente mediante un proceso de razonamiento.
Todos los valores morales ideales son perfectos y tienden al bien porque participan de la idea suprema del Bien.
De esta manera Platón elaboró una metafísica sobre los valores morales y estéticos basada en la ética de Sócrates ampliándola posteriormente a las sustancias individuales.
Este nuevo punto de vista lo llevó a Platón a investigar más profundamente la relación entre los objetos sensibles y las ideas o esencias ejemplares.
Desarrolló entonces el concepto de que las cosas cambiantes son las copias, espejismos o imitaciones de las ideas verdaderas y esa era la relación que veía entre el mundo sensible y el inteligible.
El verdadero significado del devenir de Platón era la búsqueda del acercamiento gradual a la idea para lograr que se realice tanto en la personalidad como en la sociedad, realización que es tarea de Dios y de los hombres.
La filosofía es una actividad mental y se ocupa principalmente del Ser y luego del devenir, por lo tanto el acento en el pensamiento de Platón está puesto en el Ser inmutable.
El legado de Platón en Aristóteles se percibe en su afirmación de que la metafísica estudia al Ser en cuanto ser, pero Aristóteles entiende el cambio y el devenir como la causalidad final del Primer Motor Inmóvil que distingue a la contemplación teórica de los objetos inmutables como la actividad más excelsa del hombre.
La principal objeción de Aristóteles a la teoría de Platón era el dualismo entre los objetos sensibles y las ideas y ningún tipo de justificación que los uniera.
Para Aristóteles, toda la naturaleza tiene presenta una escala jerárquica de especies y cada una de ellas tiende hacia la total actualización de su esencia de una manera asombrosa e inexplicable.
La naturaleza es para Aristóteles un proceso dinámico de autoperfección y autodesarrollo y toda esa serie de fenómenos tiene un sentido y un significado.
Para Aristóteles por lo tanto el Ser de una cosa Es, sólo en acto, el ser se está realizando constantemente en la materia, en los fenómenos, atraído por la Actualidad última, el Ser Supremo.
Aristóteles pensaba que el fin del hombre es una actividad y no una cualidad mientras que para Platón parecía limitarse más a la cualidad.
Ninguna de las dos teorías sobre la realidad es la verdad total, pero ambas contribuyeron a esclarecer racionalmente una posible respuesta sobre el misterio del mundo y el sentido de la vida.
Comments
NUNCA uses o confíes en las traducciones de los traductores automáticos, no son capaces de interpretar correctamente todas las oraciones compuestas (sí pueden las palabras individuales, aunque a veces no te dan los sinónimos lo cual también es malo). Personalmente no tengo ganas de traducir todo eso, sólo te recomiendo que no confiés en los textos traducidos automáticamente a menos que conozcas algo de inglés y puedas corregir lo que haya traducido mal. Mejor consulta con alguna persona que sepa inglés; no hay nada como la inteligencia humana. Saludos.
For Plato the reality is Being eternal and consistent while the world view of Aristotle is the more defined the future.
Both positions are joined in the statement that the two realities are indeed real.
Plato, Socrates gave validity to both ethical trials through the rational discussion trying to understand these values and arrive at a definition.
Ethical values are ideals that are expected to be made in concrete form in the material world.
For Plato the ideal values are immutable and are known intuitively through a process of reasoning.
All moral values are perfect ideals and tend to participate either because of the supreme idea of Good.
In this way Plato developed a metaphysics of moral values and aesthetic based on the ethics of Socrates subsequently extending it to the individual substances.
This new point of view led him to Plato to investigate more deeply the relationship between objects and sensitive ideas or essences copies.
Then developed the concept that things are changing copies, mirages or imitations of the real ideas and that was the relationship between the world looked sensible and intelligible.
The true meaning of becoming of Plato was seeking a gradual approach to bring the idea to be carried out both in personality and in society, conduct that is the job of God and men.
The philosophy is a mental activity and deals mainly of Being and then becoming, hence the emphasis in the thinking of Plato is on being immutable.
The legacy of Plato, Aristotle in collecting on its claim that metaphysics is studying to be as being, but Aristotle understood the change and becoming the final causation of Prime Motor motionless distinguishes theoretical contemplation of objects such as the immutable excelsa activity of man.
The main objection to Aristotle was Plato's theory of dualism between objects and sensitive ideas and any kind of justification to join.
For Aristotle, all of nature is a hierarchy of species and each one tends toward the total upgrade of its essence in a stunning and inexplicable.
Nature is for Aristotle a dynamic process of self and self-development and throughout this series of phenomena has a meaning and significance.
For Aristotle therefore of the Being There is one thing, only to act, the being is being made constantly in the field for the events, attracted by the latest news, the Supreme Being.
Aristotle thought that the end of man is an activity and not a quality while Plato seemed to be limited more to the quality.
Neither of the two theories about reality is the whole truth, but both helped to clarify a possible rational response on the mystery of the world and the meaning of life.
hola..
no tengo mucho tiempo como para traducir todo eso..
pero si tengo tiempo para decirte que no uses los traductores de internet porq traducen muy mal..
trata de pedircelo a algun amigo/a o a algun profesor/a
mira copia el texto busca un traductor online en glogle como este http://translate.google.com/translate_t?hl=es# lo pegas hay selecionas de española ingles y listo
For Plato the reality is Being eternal and consistent while the world view of Aristotle is the more defined the future.
Both positions are joined in the statement that the two realities are indeed real.
Plato, Socrates gave validity to both ethical trials through the rational discussion trying to understand these values and arrive at a definition.
Ethical values are ideals that are expected to be made in concrete form in the material world.
For Plato the ideal values are immutable and are known intuitively through a process of reasoning.
All moral values are perfect ideals and tend to participate either because of the supreme idea of Good.
In this way Plato developed a metaphysics of moral values and aesthetic based on the ethics of Socrates subsequently extending it to the individual substances.
This new point of view led him to Plato to investigate more deeply the relationship between objects and sensitive ideas or essences copies.
Then developed the concept that things are changing copies, mirages or imitations of the real ideas and that was the relationship between the world looked sensible and intelligible.
The true meaning of becoming of Plato was seeking a gradual approach to bring the idea to be carried out both in personality and in society, conduct that is the job of God and men.
The philosophy is a mental activity and deals mainly of Being and then becoming, hence the emphasis in the thinking of Plato is on being immutable.
The legacy of Plato, Aristotle in collecting on its claim that metaphysics is studying to be as being, but Aristotle understood the change and becoming the final causation of Prime Motor motionless distinguishes theoretical contemplation of objects such as the immutable excelsa activity of man.
The main objection to Aristotle was Plato's theory of dualism between objects and sensitive ideas and any kind of justification to join.
For Aristotle, all of nature is a hierarchy of species and each one tends toward the total upgrade of its essence in a stunning and inexplicable.
Nature is for Aristotle a dynamic process of self and self-development and throughout this series of phenomena has a meaning and significance.
For Aristotle therefore of the Being There is one thing, only to act, the being is being made constantly in the field for the events, attracted by the latest news, the Supreme Being.
Aristotle thought that the end of man is an activity and not a quality while Plato seemed to be limited more to the quality.
Neither of the two theories about reality is the whole truth, but both helped to clarify a possible rational response on the mystery of the world and the meaning of life.